Amended Program to Show Compliance with New State Standards
Recommendations from Review Panel Regarding Programs to Prepare
Teachers of Health (MA)

|
Program Level |
Major (# Credits) |
Minor (# Credits) |
Group Major (# Credits) |
Group
Minor (# Credits) |
Endorsement Only (# Credits) |
|
Elementary |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
Secondary |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
K-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of Standards/Guidelines: |
Pub. Date: June 2000 |
Program Assessment Summary/Recommendation |
|||||
|
X |
Meets all standards and requirements |
|
Not all standards and requirements are met |
|
Insufficient documentation for program review |
|
X |
Approval |
|
Approval Pending |
|
Approval Suspended |
|
Standards/Requirements
Not Met: |
|||||
|
Additional
information needed/action to be taken: |
|||||
|
Comments: It
is suggested that an emphasis be added in planning that includes evaluating
the appropriateness of previously developed materials. There are so many materials available
through print, voluntary agency and industry, and the web that candidates
will need to be “good consumers” of instructional materials. The
effort made by Reviewers
were concerned that, although “theme weeks” (HLED 490) are an engaging
instructional strategy and can provide environmental support for young people
and reinforcement of instruction, pre-service candidates must be cognizant
that one-time, special events are not effective instructional strategies by
themselves and they cannot replace classroom instruction of knowledge and
skill development. The
State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards continues to produce
helpful resources. There are currently
many new SCASS products, beyond the framework document, that would be useful
resources for the assessment course.. It is recommended that faculty continue to
be involved in professional development activities offered by Michigan
Department of Education and contact the MDE Health Education consultant for
updates. It
is critical that faculty develop a system for collecting outcome data,
analyzing candidate performance, and using that data for program improvement
in preparation for the third cycle of State program review 2005-2012. |
|||||