National Science Teachers
Association
Please include
one copy of this cover sheet with each program report.
SUBMITTED BY:
Eastern
(Name
of Institution)
COMPILER: Dr.Peggy Liggit , Dr. Marshall Thomsen, Dr. Vance Kennedy, Dr. Bonnie Wylo
DATE: PHONE: 734-487-0118
DATE OF ON-SITE VISIT:
NAME OF PROGRAM OFFERED FOR REVIEW IN THIS
DOCUMENT:
Science with
Secondary Teaching Certification
Please
list the programs offered by your institution in outline form, distinguishing
them by: (a) level of the program
(undergraduate [UG], postbaccalaureate [PB], graduate
[G]; (b) grade range for which preparation is intended; (c) science subjects
in which candidates would be licensed to teach; and (d) nature of
preparation (single field [SF], dual field [DF], broad field [BF], minor or
endorsement [M/E], or other [O] and the matrix number or page number to
which reviewers should refer. See the example under the instructions for
clarification. (For large or complex
programs, attach a separate page with this information.)
LEVEL GRADE SUBJECT(S) NAT MATRIX #
UG & PB 7-12 Biology SF
1
UG & PB 7-12 Chemistry SF 1
UG & PB 7-12 Physics SF 1
UG & PB 7-12 Earth
Science SF 1
UG & PB 7-12 General
Science:
(biology, chemistry, earth science, physics, and math) BF 1
Checklist of
materials to be enclosed with this program review document:
A.
For the overview
and scope of the program, please provide:
·
Explanation of the knowledge base, philosophy
for preparation, and goals and objectives of the program.
·
Overview of the program and how science
education relates to other fields of study in education and in the sciences.
·
List of faculty with primary assignments
in the specialty area, including rank, responsibilities and tenure status. (Do not send vitae.)
·
The number of graduates
from the program over the last three years, or an explanation if there have
been none over that period.
·
Criteria used at admission to post-baccalaureate
programs to determine if the candidate has adequate content background
in the subject to be taught.
B.
Matrices
C.
Appendices
This section should include any documentation needed to validate
assertions made in the matrix. This
could include, but is not limited to:
·
Program descriptions and course(s) of study including courses and sequences
taken by semester/quarter/trimester. Clearly
distinguish required from elective courses.
Advising sheets are suggested for all programs.
·
Syllabi as needed to validate indicators,
learning experiences and assessments.
·
Copies of significant assessment instruments or descriptions of
criteria for assessment not found in syllabi.
·
Data summaries and analyses based on candidate performance.
·
Documentation of goals for improvement of science education over the
next five years and the basis for selecting these goals.
NOTE: The appendices should be
limited to a maximum of 100 pages. The
complete program review document should be no more than 140 pages.
I
verify that the information provided in this program review document is accurate
and true:
Peggy Liggit
Name (please print)

Assistant
Professor (734)_487-0118
Position Telephone
Dept.
of Biology, 316 Mark Jefferson, Eastern
Address