Eastern
CEC/Department of Special Education
Survey of Program Graduates and Their Employers
The Department of Special Education surveys its program graduates every five years to assist department faculty in revising and enhancing the initial preparation programs in Special Education. A random sample of school district Superintendents and Directors of Special Education are also selected and surveyed, further assisting the department to fine-tune programs and courses to meet the demands of the field.
Survey instruments were sent through surface mail to 673 graduates of initial preparation programs in the Department of Special Education. The time-span addressed were program graduates from December, 1997 through April, 2002. Thirty-four (34) surveys were sent to randomly selected Superintendents and Directors of Special Education in the state of Michigan. Surveys were received through July 30, 2002, at which time data were recorded and analyzed.
Of the 673 surveys sent to program graduates, fifty-four (54) were returned with out-of-date addresses, resulting in a corrected sample size of 619. Two hundred twenty-eight (228) surveys were completed and returned by the July 30th date, representing a thirty-seven percent (37%) return rate. An additional eight (8) completed surveys were returned after the July 30 deadline and were not included in the sample.
Thirty-four (34) surveys were sent to randomly selected Superintendents and Directors of Special Education. Nine (9) completed surveys were returned, representing a twenty-seven percent (27%) return rate.
Results - Program Graduates
Demographic data revealed that the majority of respondents (53%) have been teaching special education for three or more years. Ninety-one percent (91%) or respondents are female, seven percent (7%) are male, and two percent (2%) did not respond.
All participants indicated their area of initial preparation, with six respondents indicating a double-major. These data are depicted in Table 1.
| Major Area |
Number |
Percent |
| Students with Emotional Impairment |
84 |
37% |
| Students with Hearing Impairment |
20 |
9% |
| Students with Learning Disabilities* |
6 |
2% |
| Students with Mental Impairment |
63 |
27% |
| Students with Phys/Health Impair. |
22 |
9% |
| Students with Speech/Language Imp. |
28 |
11% |
| Students with Visual Impairment |
11 |
5% |
Table 1 - Area of Initial Preparation in Special Education
(*Note: Eastern Michigan University does not provide an initial preparation program in Learning Disabilities.)
Program graduates were asked to indicate the disability area of their current teaching position. Results, displayed in Table 2, indicate that a greater percentage of program graduates are teaching in a cross-categorical classroom rather than a self-contained classroom setting. Only three percent (3%) of respondents are teaching in general education rather than special education.
It is important to note that the State of Michigan continues to require special education teachers to be trained, and receive endorsement, in a categorical manner. Based on the current information from program graduates, twenty-seven percent (27%) are employed in cross-categorical, rather than categorical, special education settings.
| Current Teaching Position |
Number |
Percent |
| Emotional Impairment |
44 |
17% |
| Hearing Impairment |
12 |
5% |
| Learning Disabilities |
44 |
17% |
| Mental Impairment |
25 |
10% |
| Physical/Health Impairment |
6 |
2% |
| Speech/Language Impairment |
29 |
11% |
| Visual Impairment |
8 |
3% |
| General Education Classroom |
8 |
3% |
| Autism |
11 |
5% |
| Cross-Categorical Special Education |
65 |
27% |
Table 2 - Current Teaching Position
Program graduates were asked to respond to twenty-four separate items evaluating the effectiveness of their initial preparation program. These twenty-four items are directly reflective of the CEC Professional Standards. Data from these items are displayed in Table 3 which appears as an insert immediately following this page.
Overall, program graduates appear to be satisfied with the outcomes of their initial professional preparation program. The consensus appears to be that the initial preparation programs in the Department of Special Education at Eastern Michigan University adequately prepare graduates as beginning-level special education teachers.
Areas of concern, where more than 20% of respondents rated their experiences as "less than adequate" or "not at all", included the following:
a. Knowledge and Skill in Teaching Reading 27% b. Knowledge and Skill in Teaching Language 32% c. Awareness of Community Agencies and Organizations to assist in the overall educational programming for children's families. 24% d. Knowledge and Skill in Teaching Mathematics 23%
These results, coupled with respondent's written commentary, indicate that program graduates believe they would benefit from additional experiences in pedagogy and methodology for providing basic reading, language, and mathematics instruction to students with disabilities. Respondents also indicated a need for additional information and experiences in locating and interacting with community agencies and organizations to support a family-centered approach to the student's special education program.