Eastern Michigan University

COE Home

EMU Home

EMU NCATE/State

Part I NCATE Report

Part II State Reports

Part III Exhibits

Part IV Tools & References

Part V Errata and Addenda

Site Map

BOE Homepage

HELP with these pages





Eastern Michigan University
Eastern Michigan University
Ypsilanti, MI, USA 48197
University Information:
734.487.1849



About EMU




© 2008 Eastern Michigan University.
All Rights Reserved.

COE NCATE 2003
                                                                                                           John W. Porter Building

 

 

 

Print this page 

Exhibit 3.12
Implementation of Work Sample Requirements in
New EMU Student Teaching Unit
Fall, 03

  The EMU Teacher Preparation Program has been in the process of implementing a revised student teaching unit over the past year. The process has included development, implementation, training of supervisors and cooperating teachers, and obtaining and using feedback from students and supervisors. This unit has integrated aspects of the prior student teaching unit, the work sample developed by the Renaissance Teacher Quality grant participants including EMU, and requirements from courses earlier in the program, specifically the performance assessments in the Introduction to Assessment and Evaluation course (EDPS 340) and Curriculum and Methods (CURR 304/305).


    Specifically, the process has included the following steps:

Renaissance Teacher Work Sample. A small group of student teachers have been involved in the grant over the past 5 years. These students have completed teacher work samples based on the requirements of the Renaissance Teacher Work
Sample. (See information on Renaissance Teacher Quality Grant)

Integration of Teacher Work Sample in Student Teaching

   Goals:

  • For student teachers to demonstrate that they influenced their students' learning.
  • To systematize expectations for the student teaching unit.
  • To assure that the unit is consistent with expectations in prior courses.

1. Summer '02. Directions and a sample unit were developed. First, an analysis of the performance assessments from the curriculum and assessment courses, the prior student teaching unit, and the Renaissance Teacher Work Sample was carried out. Based on this analysis, the new expectations and directions were developed. While the old unit required 1) outcomes tied to state standards, 2) a concept map, 3) lessons, and 4) reflections, the new unit added 1) an analysis of contextual factors, 2) a pre-unit analysis, and 3) a student learning analysis. Each of these tasks was integrated into the student journal or the unit. A sample unit on the Revolutionary War was created as a model for supervisors, cooperating teachers, and students.

2. Fall '02. A group of 6 full time student teacher supervisors and their 108 student teachers pilot tested the new unit. At the end of the semester, students and supervisors were informally surveyed. Students reported that they felt prepared and able to complete the new requirements based on their prior coursework. Supervisors made suggestions concerning the process and final student products. They suggested that students be given intermediary deadlines (by their supervisor). They also suggested that the journal activities be included in the unit rather than requiring two separate products.

3. Winter '03. All supervisors, with the exception of Early Childhood and Special Education, were asked to implement the new unit with their students. The unit was, therefore, taken to scale with 564 student teachers during Winter semester.

4. Summer '03. Rubrics were developed for each section of the unit. Changes were made in the unit and sample to make them parallel with the rubrics and to take supervisor suggestions into account. It was decided that student teachers would need to receive a 2 or 3 on each section of the rubric in order to pass. In addition, sections 1-4 (those sections that dealt with preparation of the unit) would need to be completed at a level 2 or 3 before the student teacher could teach the unit.
There was a training session for student teacher supervisors late in the summer. The session's purpose was to familiarize supervisors with the unit and new rubric and to give them practice at scoring a practice unit. Approximately 30 supervisors attended the session.

5. Fall '03. All student teachers in regular programs (not including Early Childhood or Special Education) are completing the new teaching unit. Each unit will be graded using the common directions and rubric. Scores will be collected and analyzed for future use.

In addition, supervisors were surveyed at the end of the summer concerning their experiences with the unit, what help they needed this year, and what suggestions they had for other supervisors. These surveys are in the process of being analyzed.

Teacher Work Sample Scores--Pilot Semesters

Winter 2001

Fall 2002

Winter 2002

Winter 2003

Average

Previous Page

For additional information on the accreditation/approval process, please contact Jerry H. Robbins, Dean, at 734.487.1414 or by e-mail at jerry.robbins@emich.edu. If you have any questions, comments or problems with these web pages or this web server, please contact: coe_webmaster@emich.edu.