|
© 2008 Eastern Michigan University.
All Rights Reserved.
|
John
W.
Porter
Building |
|
Print this page
Standard 4.A
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Curriculum and
Experiences
Target: Curriculum,
field experiences, and clinical practice help candidates
to demonstrate knowledge, skills, and dispositions
related to diversity. They are based on well-developed knowledge bases for,
and conceptualizations of diversity and inclusion so that candidates
can apply them effectively
in schools. Candidates learn to contextualize teaching and to draw upon
representations from the students' own experiences and knowledge. They
learn how to challenge students toward cognitive complexity and
engage all students, including students with exceptionalities,
through instructional conversation. Candidates and faculty review assessment
data that provide information about candidate's
ability to work with all students and develop a plan for improving
their practice in this area.
Requirements
related to diversity. At the initial level,
topics related to diversity permeate the curriculum, with special
attention given in several courses required of most or all
candidates. To
give some examples, most general education candidates take EDPS 322. This
course includes a group diversity project in which candidates
investigate the impact of six
variables (e.g., gender, race, language) on development and classroom
learning. SPGN 251 is
entirely about working with students with disabilities. The
writing project in SOFD 328 expects
each candidate to include diversity in analyzing the purposes of schools. (The
title of SOFD 328, "Schools
in a Multicultural Society," identifies
the degree of emphasis that is placed on diversity topics in
this required course.) The curriculum unit and other activities in CURR
304/CURR
305, taken by most candidates, require that students address
issues of diversity.
FETE
201, required of most candidates at the initial
level, occurs in a multicultural setting. Candidates are urged to include
multicultural settings in taking those of FETE 301, FETE 302, FETE
401,
and FETE 402 that are required of them. The approved list
of sites for student teaching includes only locations that represent
appreciable diversity.
At
the advanced level, programs approach diversity in a
variety of ways. For example, the
master’s program in early childhood education requires a choice of
either SOFD
550 Philosophy, Ethics and Teaching or SOFD
580 Sociology of Education. In addition, candidates are required to
take CURR
610 (now ECE
610) Family, School and Community Partnerships in Early Childhood Education.
The second required course that strongly addresses diversity is CURR 641
(now ECE
641 )
Developmental Assessment of the Young Child: Theory and
Practice.
The
curriculum and instruction (elementary, middle grades,
secondary, common learnings in curriculum (K-12) master's
degrees are infused
with
learning experiences regarding diversity. Issues of class, race,
gender, ethnicity, geographical origin, religious preferences,
and language are embraced and celebrated as strengths both within
the classroom and within the community. School counseling students
are required to take COUN
571 Cross-cultural Counseling
and educational leadership master's students are required
to take EDLD
509 Educational Leadership in a Pluralistic
Society.
The
master’s program in educational media/technology actively recruits
and promotes a diverse faculty to not only serve as role models, but more
importantly to assist in developing teachers with the knowledge and skill
to address the unique needs of a diverse student population. In the master’s
program in reading, required courses include RDNG
655 The Integrated Literacy Curriculum; RDNG
656 Language Development, Literacy and the Young Child; and RDNG
686 Practicum: Designing Literacy Intervention Programs, all of which
have a major diversity component. See also the institution’s response
to IRA standards 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, and 12.2
Special
education programs deal extensively with diverse learners,
especially those with disabilities. Art programs are centered around Discipline-Based
Art
Education in which aesthetics offers a fertile context
for understanding and appreciation of multiculturalism.
Knowledge
bases for diversity and inclusion. The knowledge
base for the initial program level reflects our substantial institutional
commitment
to diversity and inclusion. See Exhibit
CF-12, section on "diverse
and democratic society." Similarly, at the advanced level,
the knowledge bases reflect our commitment to these topics. See Exhibit
CF-13, section 5 on "diverse
and democratic society." For
both the initial and advanced levels, see Exhibit
CF-14, section on "diverse and democratic society," for the sources that we have
used to conceptualize our position on the importance of "diversity" and "a
democratic society. "
Contextualize
teaching; engage all students. At the
initial level, our standards/benchmarks include Section V-"Educators
for a diverse and democratic society celebrate diversity in
schools and communities. They
prepare students for active participation in democracy through
nurturing critical thinking, creative thinking, and problem solving
with communities." In particular, item V-S requires
our candidates to "adapt
instruction and assessments to meet the diverse needs of learners
(e.g.,
backgrounds, experiences, learning styles, developmental levels,
etc.)." Item
V-T requires our candidates to "create opportunities to encourage
(P-12) students to value and respect diversity." In SPGN
251, the lesson design/adaptation activity requires students to prepare
a lesson plan and then provide modifications that will make the
lesson appropriate for a student with specific disabilities. The reflective
lesson design project of CURR 304 and CURR 305,
required of most candidates, calls for the student to show how the lesson
is to be adapted for students representing
various kinds of diversity. The curriculum unit of CURR 304 and CURR
305 must include a demonstration of how instruction is to be modified
to reflect diversity in the class. The classroom assessment plan of EDPS
340, required of most candidates and the reading lesson plan of RDNG
310 and RDNG 311 both
require a demonstration of appropriate adaptation. The
reflections assignment of FETE 301 and FETE 302,
required of most candidates, requires thought on how instruction was or should
have been appropriately adapted in a classroom that was observed.
The
FETE observation forms, the review of the student teaching unit, and the
recommendation
forms of the cooperating teacher and university
supervisor all call for professionals to assess the degree to
which the
candidate has
modified instruction and the nature of the modification, all
such as to the needs of students of diverse backgrounds and
abilities.
At
the advanced level, most candidates are experienced teachers
(and are often experienced
in other professional roles). As a result, it is not
difficult to contextualize teaching. Programs focus on
structuring experiences such that candidates
engage in exemplary professional practice and exhibit
dispositions that show leadership and initiative. Candidates
at the advanced level learn
to engage all students, including those with disabilities,
by their knowledge and use of technology, their abilities
to communicate and relate, by their
knowledge of diversity and cultural context, by valuing
diversity, and by respect for children and adults from
all backgrounds.
Assessment
data. Some of the available assessment data
related to diversity at the initial level may be found in Exhibit 2.3.A (Group
Diversity Project), Exhibit
2.3.E (Student Teaching Unit), Exhibit 2.3.U (Lesson
Design/Adaptation Activity), and others. Exhibit 2.3.F (items
37 and 38) provides information on program completers' self-assessments
on diversity-related
topics at the time of program completion. Exhibit 2.3.G (item
15) provides information on first year teachers self-assessments
on how well they were prepared to work with diversity in the
classroom. Exhibit
2.3.H (item
15) provides information from the supervisors of first year teachers
as to how they were performing in dealing with diversity. These data will
continue to be gathered and reviewed on an annual basis.
At
the advanced level, some of the available assessment
data related to diversity may be found in Exhibit
2.3.W, item 7 in particular, and Exhibit
2.3.X, item 7 in particular. These items show the perceptions
of recent advanced program completers and their supervisors as to how well
the program completer has mastered matters related to diversity. The data
cover recent completers of most advanced programs. Exhibit
2.3.Y and Exhibit 2.3.Z provide
generally comparable information about recent completers of educational
leadership programs.
Previous Page
For
additional
information
on the
accreditation/approval
process,
please
contact
Jerry H. Robbins,
Dean, at
734.487.1414
or by e-mail
at jerry.robbins@emich.edu.
If you
have any
questions,
comments
or problems
with these
web pages
or this
web server,
please
contact: coe_webmaster@emich.edu.
|
|