Print this
page
Exhibit 5.5
Summaries of Faculty Evaluations
Under the
master contracts with the faculty unions (AAUP
Contract [see Exhibit 5.4] and the Lecturer's
Contract [see Exhibit 5.4]),
there is no mechanism for maintaining a summary of faculty evaluations. Review
of the materials submitted for evaluation at any major decision point (e.g.,
promotion, tenure) results in a recommendation from the dean to the Provost
that is either
positive or negative in terms of what the applicant has sought
at that point.
Student
ratings of instructors and courses are published approximately every two
years, are available only in hard copy, and are available
in the Library,
in the Dean's office, and in each Department Head's office. The
most recent edition covers the period Fall 2000
to Summer 2002. A sample
entry follows, with some data altered to disguise its association
with a particular faculty member:
| Instructor |
Dept
Crs Sec Term |
Res/Enr |
Rating
of Instructor |
Rating
of Course |
| |
A B C D E |
A B C D E |
|
(Name)
|
PSY 101 032 Wi01
|
8/ 11
|
|
|
| |
PSY 101 039 Fa01
|
47/ 97
|
15% 34% 36% 11% 4%
|
38%
52% 10% 0% 0%
|
| |
PSY 321 010 Wi01
|
21/
|
8%
48% 14% 0% 0%
|
11%
43% 40% 4% 2%
|
etc.
COE faculty
members awarded tenure, effective Fall 2003,
were: Martha Baiyee, Julianne O'Brien
Pedersen, and Kay Woodiel. Faculty members promoted, effective Fall 2003, were (to professor) Jim Barrott, Peggy Daisey;
and (to associate professor) Martha Baiyee, Julianne O'Brien
Pedersen, and Kay Woodiel. These
promotion and tenure awards represented the entire pool of applicants
this year from the COE. All probationary faculty members were reappointed
for the year.
Previous Page
