Eastern Michigan University
CURR
305
Curriculum and Methods (Secondary)
Three Semester Hours
EMU Program Theme: EMU teacher preparation programs develop knowledgeable professionals who are caring, reflective decision-makers in a culturally and technologically diverse democratic society.
Catalog Description: The concept of curriculum and its relationship to differing philosophies of education and styles of teaching. The instructional process and multiple teaching strategies examined and applied through lesson planning and demonstration. Classroom management principles and techniques considered in the light of a curriculum and instruction perspective. Includes a planned practicum experience in public schools in addition to the regularly scheduled hours.
Course Purpose: This course develops the pedagogical and curriculum knowledge needed by a teacher. It is taken along with a course in assessment and a field experience in a grade 7-12 classroom. As students apply the course ideas in the field, and reflect on the meaning of these experiences, they become reflective decision-makers. Readings and discussions focus on the roles and responsibilities of teachers in a diverse democratic society. Professional challenges and issues are also considered. Finally, students learn to develop caring classroom environments for learning and risk-taking.
Course Outcomes:
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
1. Reflect upon and discuss various philosophies of education and curriculum2. Select and analyze curriculum standards, goals and content3. Write clearly stated learning outcomes4. Apply principles of systematic instructional planning and decision making that result in students' conceptual learning5. Design, use and analyze the effects of direct, inductive, and social (group learning) lessons6. Demonstrate success in using questioning, discussion, and other communication strategies7. Explain how to adapt curriculum, instruction, assessments, and management for students with special physical, cultural, intellectual or emotional needs.8. Describe ways to create an organized, caring classroom environment that promotes student motivation, attention, and learning
Textbook: Sparks-Langer, G., Pasch, M., Starko, A., Gardner, T., Moody, C., (2000) Teaching As Decision Making:Successful Practices For The Secondary Teacher. Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Course Requirements:
40% Unit (Two-three weeks): Rationale, Classroom Composition, Content Analysis, Goals and Objectives, Pre-assessment, Lesson Plans, Authentic Assessment and Test (from EDPS 340), Family/Community Involvement, Bibliography/Resources
***Must follow guidelines approved by Teacher Education Department.
20% Microteaching:Teach 1-2 lessons to grade 7-12 students and/or to peers using combinations of direct, inductive, and social approaches.
20% Classroom Management Project:Collect resources and/or make plans for the first weeks of teaching. Integrate readings and resources to create the project. May include designing lessons to teach others in the class about classroom management.
20% Tests .Self-Reflection Journals, Papers and/or Projects
Course Content:
1 TEACHING AS DECISION MAKING
A. Reflective Decision Making
The Decision Making ModelThe Authors' Beliefs and AssumptionsHow Is the Text Content Organized?How Is the Text Content Presented?B. Planning a Unit of Instruction
General Unit PlanningExample Unit: Zimbabwe: A World's View from Africa
2 CHOOSING AND ANALYZING CLASSROOM GOALS
A. Choosing Worthwhile Educational Goals
Three Views of Educational PhilosophyA Short Course on Recent Educational HistoryClassification of Educational GoalsB. Analyzing Content Goals
Zimbabwe: A World's View from AfricaKen Cowan's PuzzleThree Domains of Educational ContentThe Structure of Subject MatterConcept LearningConcept MappingGeneralization LearningFactual LearningContent Analysis
Content Analysis in an Interdisciplinary UnitC. The Analysis of Learning ProcessFinal Thoughts on the Structure of Content and the
Analysis of the Learning Process
3 WRITING INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES AND EVALUATING RESULTS
A. Writing Clearly Stated Objectives
The Controversy over the Use of Instructional ObjectivesThe Nature of an Instructional ObjectiveRecognizing Instructional ObjectivesWriting Clearly Stated Instructional ObjectivesB. Writing and Classifying Cognitive Objectives
Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational ObjectivesCommon Questions about Bloom's TaxonomyIndependent Practice Activity B. Bloom's TaxonomyC. Designing Evaluation Procedures
Diagnosing Learners: Pre-assessmentValidityReliabilityEnhancing the Reliability of the Teacher-Developed TestAlternative Evaluation ApproachesEvaluation/Assessment Modes and Educational Philosophies
4 UNDERSTANDING STUDENT LEARNING
A. The Learner: Students' Personal Characteristics
Intellectual AbilitiesPrior Knowledge and ExperienceCultureInterestsLearning StylesB. Learning: How Does Learning Occur?
Sensory MemoryShort-Term Memory
Long-Term Memory
Constructivism and Brain-Compatible Learning
5 DEVELOPING POWERFUL LEARNING ACTIVITIES
A. Authentic Learning
What Makes a Problem Real?
Building Toward Authentic LearningB. Principles for Designing Learning Experiences
Cultural Context PrincipleConceptual Focus PrinciplePrior Knowledge PrincipleHigher Level Thinking Principle
Active Processing Principle
Variety Principle
6 DESIGNING LEARNING EXPERIENCES: DIRECT TEACHING
A. Research, Teaching Approaches and Lesson Planning Research on Teaching
Four Approaches to TeachingA Lesson Planning FrameworkB. Direct TeachingThe Elements of Direct Lessons
When to Use Direct Lessons
7 DESIGNING LEARNING EXPERIENCES: INDUCTIVE APPROACHES
A. Inductive Approaches
Experiences Designed to Build ConceptsInquiry Lessons: Interpreting and Applying DataAuthentic Research with StudentsProblem-Based LearningMetacognition and Planning Inductive ExperiencesB. Questioning and Discussion
Questioning
Conducting Discussions
8 DESIGNING LEARNING EXPERIENCES: SOCIAL AND INDEPENDENT APPROACHES
A. Social Approaches
Role PlaySimulations: Human and ElectronicCooperative Group Learning
B. Centers, Contracts, and Skills of Independent LearningCentersContractsTeaching Skills of IndependenceStudents, Interaction, and Developing a Learning Community
9 TEACHING FOR DIVERSITY
A. Students with Educational Disabilities
What Are Educational Disabilities?Educational Disabilities in SchoolStrategies for Teaching Students with DisabilitiesRecent Educational Movements Affecting Students with Disabilities
Learning TogetherB. Gifted and Talented StudentsWhat Is a "Gifted" Student?What Are Gifted Students Like?But What Do I Do With Gifted Students?Serving Many Students
C. Teaching for DiversityTeaching for DiversityTeaching Bilingual Students
D. Teaching in Urban Schools and Other SettingsTeaching Strategies for Urban Schools: The PREMIER Model
10 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: TRADITIONS, PROGRAMS, AND RESEARCH
A. Three Traditions of Classroom Management
Tradition 1: CommonsenseTradition 2: Behavior ManagementTradition 3: Humanistic
B. Useful Insights from Contemporary Research FindingsEstablishing Classroom RulesEstablishing Classroom Routines and ProceduresThe Effective Classroom ManagerPreventing Classroom Disruptions
Saving Instructional Time: Time on Task
11 A RATIONAL APPROACH TO CLASSROOM MANAGEMEN26
A. Proactive Strategies to Prevent Classroom Disruptions
Teacher and Student NeedsClassroom ArrangementTeaching a Discipline CurriculumB. Responding to Disruptive Student s
Dreikur 's Classification System of MisbehaviorEstablishing an Information SystemThe Use of Positive MomentsImplementing Positive Moments: A SummaryOrganizing and Conducting Quality Circle MeetingsResponding to EmergenciesC. Additional Management Techniques
Nonverbal Classroom Management Techniques
Verbal Cues in Management Techniques
Cultural Continuity and Discontinuity
12 LOOKING BACK AND LOOKING AHEAD
A. The Teacher as Decision Maker
Review of the Book's StructureThe Decision-Making ModelB. The Teacher as Continuous LearnerC. The Teacher as Educational Change Agent
A Historical PerspectiveLiberating Education from Past LimitationsHopeful Trends in EducationYour Role in the Future of EducationA Note on the Process of Change
References/Knowledge-Base:
Anderson, J.R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.
Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple Intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Banks, J. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5-32.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock 9Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
Campbell, L., Campbell, B., Dickenson, D. (1999). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
Daniels, H. & Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter. York, MA: Stenhouse Publishers.
Everston, C., Anderson, C., Anderson, L., & Brophy, J. (1980). Relationships between classroom behaviors and student outcomes in junior high mathematics and English classes. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 43-60.
Gagne, R.M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hall, L.E. (1989). The effects of cooperative learning on achievement: A meta-analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 343A.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Joyce, B. & Calhoun, E. (1998). Learning to teach inductively. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. California: Author.
Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 54-63.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.L.C. (1991). Research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 777)
Marzano, R.J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 087)
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., Pollock, J. (2001) Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mason, L. (1995). Analogy, meta-conceptual awareness and conceptual change: A classroom study. Educational Studies, 20(2), 267-291.
Mayer, R.E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43-64.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister C.C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rosenshine, B., Meister C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions. A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
Rowe, M. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control. Part 1 wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 8194.
Sternberg, R.J. (1979). The development of human intelligence (Tech. Rep. No. 4, Cognitive Development Series). New Haven, CT: Yale University, Department of Psychology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 174-658)
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69-95.
Walberg, H.J. (1999). Productive teaching. In H.C. Waxman & H.J. Walberg (Eds.) New directions for teaching practice and research, 75-104. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen Publishing Corporation.
Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D., & Walberg, h.J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294.
Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performances: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.