Eastern Michigan University EMU HOME
 

Children's Lit home

What's New

About
Faculty
Courses
Graduate Studies
S.C.A.L.E.

Links

Children's Literature Studies at EMU

|Department of English Language and Literature|Pray-Harrold Hall|Ypsilanti, MI|48197|

2009 Fall Semester:

CHL518: History of Children’s Literature

Description: This course surveys the major children’s authors, genres, and literary movements that constitute the history of children’s literature. The course also considers the history of childhood and other subjects related to children’s social and intellectual development.

Professor: Dr. Annette Wannamaker

Class meets: Mondays 6:30 – 9:10 p.m.

Office Hours: Mondays 5 - 6:30 p.m.

Wednesdays 10:30 – 12:30 a.m. and 3:15 – 4:45 p.m.

Students also are encouraged to make appointments during other times and to email with any questions: awannamak AT emich DOT edu

Required Texts:

Stahl, J.D., Tina Hanlon and Elizabeth Lennox Keyser, eds. Crosscurrents of Children’s Literature: An Anthology of Texts and Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Caroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland. (doesn’t matter which edition, but since I teach the Norton Critical Edition in the theory and criticism course, you may want to get that one).

Kipling, Rudyard. The Jungle Book.

Gaiman, Neil. The Graveyard Book.

Schedule for Reading and Writing Assignments:

Sept 14: Starting point: one version of the history of children’s literature (which we’ll spend the rest of the term contradicting and problematizing, but one has to start somewhere . . . ); sign up for student presentations; introductions.

Sept 21: Assumptions about children and literature written for children; the implied child (adult?) reader; cultural studies and childhood as evolving social construct as a frame for the course.

Read:
• Charles Perrault “Little Red Riding Hood” (23-24) and “Bluebeard” (27-29).
• Roald Dahl, “Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf” (811-812)
• John Hudson Wynne “from Choice Emblems,” (141-142)
• William Wordsworth “Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood” (143-145).
• Heinrich Hoffman, “The Sad Tale of the Match-Box” (157)
• Robert Lewis Stevenson, “My Shadow”(443)
• Mark West, “Teaching Banned Books” (857-862)
• Judy Blume, “from Forever” (862-6)
• Skim the timeline (995-1002)

Sept 28: Instruction or (and?) delight

Read:
• Editors, “To Teach or Entertain” (1-5)
• Sheila Egoff “Precepts, Pleasures, and Portents” (12- 15)
• Aelfric, “Carius est nobis flagellari pro doctrina quam nescire” (20-22)
• Sarah Trimmer, “On the Care Which Is Requisite in the Choice of Books for Children” (29-31)
• Maria Edgeworth, “The Purple Jar”(35-38) and “The Birthday Present” (38-44)
• Jane Taylor, “The Little Fisherman” (44-45)
• Peter Parley “The Pleasure Boat: or, The Broken Promise” (48-50)

Rachel's folklore presentation: folklore.ppt

Weeks 4 and 5: Folktales and fairy tales adapted for the child

Oct 5: Read:
• Bruno Bettelheim, “Uses of Enchantment” (265-284)
• Maria Tatar “Reading Fairy Tales” (284-291)
• Brothers Grimm, “The Frog King, or Iron Henry”(146-148) and “Hansel and Gretel” (149-152).
• Angela Carter, “Vasilissa the Fair” (359-362).
• Marie Le Prince de Beaumont, “Beauty and the Beast” (366-373)
• Joseph Jacobs, “Jack and the Beanstalk” (393-397).

Annette's outline for discussion: Terms

Oct 12: Read:
• Editors, “Satires and Spin-offs” (767-774)
• Joe Winston, “Revising the Fairy Tale Through Magic” (787-793)
• Antonia Barber, “The Enchanter’s Daughter” (794-798)
• Jon C. Stott, “Will the Real Dragon Please Stand Up?” (799-805)
• Edith Nesbit, “The Last of the Dragons” (806-809)
• H. C. Andersen, “The Little Mermaid” (891-902)
• Waller Hastings, “Moral Simplification in Disney’s The Little Mermaid” (903-907).

Oct 19: Illustrated texts

Read:
• Editors, “Words and Pictures” (707-714)
• Maurice Sendak on “Randolf Caldecott” (733-4)
• Comenius (735)
• Walter Crane (738-40)
• Randolf Caldecott (741-2)
• Kate Greenaway (743-4)
• Beatrix Potter (744-6)
• Wanda Gag (744-6)
• Garth Williams (751-3)
• Maurice Sendak (754)
• Trina Schart Hyman (760-1)
• Chris Van Allsburg (762-3)

Annette's History of Illustrated Texts PPT

Weeks 7-8: “The Golden Age”

Leslie's PPT Presentation

Oct 26: Read:
• Elisabeth Segel, “Realism and Children’s Literature” (417-419)
• C. W. Sullivan, "Fantasy" (420-428)
• Ursula Le Guin, "Why Are Americans Afraid of Dragons?" (428-431)
• Nathanial Hawthorne, “from A Wonder Book for Boys and Girls” (51-59)
• Edward Lear, “The Owl and the Pussy Cat” etc. (312-315)
• Carlo Collodi, “from The Adventures of Pinocchio” (440-441)
• Francis Hodgeson Burnett, “from The Secret Garden” (595-609)
• Louisa May Alcott, “from Little Women” (82-87) and (559-571)
• Robert Louis Stevenson “from Treasure Island” (587-94)

Nov 2: Read:
• Isaac Watts, “Against Idleness and Mischief,” “The Sluggard,” and “Obedience to Parents” (32-33).
• Jane Taylor and Ann Taylor Gilbert, “The Star” (46).
• Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland (just Wonderland, not Through the Looking Glass)

Nov 9: Gender as Genre: boys’ and girls’ books:

Read:

• Elizabeth Segel, “As the Twig is Bent: Gender and Childhood Reading” (511-524)
• Astrid Lindgren, “from Pippi Longstocking” (170-172)
• Thomas Bailey Aldrich “from The Story of a Bad Boy” (158-165)
• Thomas Hughes, “from Tom Brown’s Schooldays” (543-559)
• Carolyn Keene section (642-647)
• Ellen Seiter, “Toy-Based Videos for Girls” (830-843).
• Marina Warner, “Boys Will Be Boys” (844-851)

Jenna's PPT on Boys' Books

Ricah's PPT on girls' books

Nov 16: Ideology and/in children’s books

Read:
• Herbert Kohl, “Should we Burn Babar?” (877-891)
• Laura Ingalls Wilder, “from Little House on the Prairie” (954-965)
• Michael Dorris “Trusting the Words” (965-970)
• Louise Erdrich “from Birchbark House” (970-982)
• Francesca Lia Block, “from Weetzie Bat” (820-825)
• Bruce Coville, from Am I Blue?” (824-829)

Sandra's PPT on Hollindale

Nov 23: Rudyard Kipling, The Jungle Book

Nov 30: Neil Gaiman, The Graveyard Book

Dec 7: Seminar Papers Due and Student Presentations of Research.

Dec 14: Final Exam

Some General Policies:

Attendance Policy: The official English Department policy is that students who miss two weeks worth of a class – for whatever reason -- should expect to fail that course and should probably drop.

The Children’s Literature Program policy is that graduate students should never miss classes, except for an emergency. Therefore, graduate students in our Program are allowed one “excused” absence in case of an emergency. For each absence after one, for whatever reason, the student’s course grade will drop a grade:

1 absence = no points deducted
2 absences = - 3 percent
3 absences = - 8 percent
4 absences = - 15 percent (final grade B or lower)
> 4 absences = -25 percent (final grade C or lower)

Late paper policy: I will accept late work, but will deduct points from the grade – a half grade (3 percent) for each late day.

Politeness Policies: Part of my job as a professor is to create a learning environment where students feel safe, respected, and able to get the most out of their learning experiences. I promise to treat all students with respect, but also must work to maintain a structured learning environment where student learning is the top priority.

Be on time. When you come to class late, it is disruptive to everyone around you. It is rude. If you cannot make it to my class on time, please drop the course.

Turn off your cell phone. It is not okay for your cell phone to ring, vibrate, chirp, or chime in any classroom. If you are expecting a very important call (your wife is about to have a baby, for instance) you can talk to us before class to let everyone know that your cell phone will be on and may disrupt class. Otherwise, please turn it off.

No laptops. Some students take notes on laptops, but too many students use their laptops to poke one another on Facebook, to check email, or to play World of Warcraft during class. Only students with a documented learning disability are allowed to use laptops during class.

Respect your fellow students! If there are students dominating class discussion by taking up too much space (speaking so much that others can’t “get a word in” or interrupting others or blurting out comments before anyone else can speak) I’ll need to institute a “hand-raising” rule to make sure everyone is able to participate equally. Also, everyone needs to feel the classroom is a safe space. In other words, while disagreements about issues are a normal part of academic debate and are encouraged, rudeness is never acceptable: students will listen to one another, respect one another, and address differing points of view politely.

Assignments and Grades:

Students will complete assignments that require them
• to read a variety of literary and critical texts,
• to research historical texts and trends, and
• to effectively present this research in both written and oral formats.

There will also be a final exam covering the reading assigned during the course. The final exam serves dual purposes:

• first, students will demonstrate they comprehend the texts read for class and that they are able to synthesize ideas by putting a variety of texts and concepts into dialogue with one another and,
• second, the exam serves as a practice run for the MA exam students take in order to complete the Program, which follows a similar format.

Here’s a break-down of the grades for assignments:

• Final Exam: 20 percent (200 points)
• Oral Presentation on selected topic: 30 percent (300 points)
• Seminar Paper (paper + 10 minute oral presentation of research to class on December 7): 50 percent (500 points=400 for paper+100 for presentation)
• All work must be turned in for students to earn a passing grade in the course.

Grading Criteria:
All student work for the course will be evaluated on the comprehension and application of current critical theories, terms, and debates in the field of children’s literature; on the ability to conduct academic research; and on the quality of the writing/presentation of information. The quality of writing will be evaluated based on audience awareness, organization, correctness, adherence to MLA citation guidelines, and on the effective use of evidence to build a convincing argument or interpretation. Oral presentations will be evaluated based on all these, plus the student’s ability to effectively, clearly communicate ideas to an audience.