Eastern Michigan University EMU HOME
 
Feature header
 

Oct. 9, 2007 issue
Symposium provides EMU ideas to help retain its students


By Ron Podell

 

For years, Eastern Michigan University has brought in solid numbers of freshman students to campus. However, it has had problems retaining them.

In an effort to curb that trend and come up with fresh ideas to keep students at Eastern, EMU's Enrollment Management and the Office of Retention and Student Success hosted a Retention Symposium Oct. 5 in Welch Hall.

Ron Hammond

RETAIN STUDENTS: Ron Hammond, a
sociology professor from Utah Valley State
College (UVSC), discusses an
alumni
survey the college conducted to learn
more about why students graduated or
dropped out of UVSC. Hammond and
Cheryl Hanewicz, also of UVSC and a
former EMU faculty member, gave
presentations during a retention
symposium conducted in Welch Hall Oct. 5.

"In light of the dwindling federal and state support to higher education, and the increased cost to students and families, we want to make sure we are doing what we can to assist students," said Lynette Findley, EMU's associate vice president for student retention and student success. "We need to continue to provide a quality education with the necessary academic support in a timely manner."

Guests Cheryl Hanewicz and Ron J. Hammond, both from Utah Valley State College (UVSC), presented, "A Unique Study of the Student Retention Issue: Finding Applied Solutions Using Spatial and Non-Spatial Research Techniques."

Using GIS methods traditionally used in spatial mapping and results of a research survey that was sent to approximately 2,500 UVSC alumni, the two compiled a blueprint as to why students there were dropping out. The study, which elicited 225 responses, looked at student retention patterns in UVSC students who entered the college in 1999 and what transpired over the next six-year period.

Of 3,147 students that entered UVSC that year, 2,006 or 64 percent ended up dropping out.

"I think we found some things that today make you go 'hmm,'" said Hammond, a sociology professor at UVSC.

Some of the findings included:

  • Students who did not make a personal connection with a faculty member were more likely to drop out. Approximately 71 percent of students who graduated said a faculty member positively affected them while dropouts only reported a 39 percent rate.
  • Students who did not make a personal connection with a staff member were more likely to drop out. Again, 71 percent of those who graduated reported making a personal connection to staff members. Only 45 percent of the dropouts responding said they had a strong connection with a staff member.
  • Students who worked more than 30 hours a week were more likely to drop out than students working less.
  • A number of students who reached the point of dropping out did not seek assistance before making that decision.

"We need to intervene with these students before they reach that wall," Hammond said.

Students missing classes and feeling overwhelmed by the academic demands of college were some of the "flashers" found that let administrators and faculty know students are at the point of dropping out, said Hanewicz, an assistant professor and senior director of student success and retention at UVSC.

In addition to making strong personal connections, graduates reported they made more friends and became involved in more extracurricular activities than dropouts.

During the symposium, Hammond also presented "Improving Student Retention at a High Turnover College." Hanewicz, a former EMU faculty member in the School of Technology Studies for a decade, also presented, "Using a Geographic Information System to Study Student Retention Patterns at Eastern Michigan University."

"Our retention council will be making recommendations about retention in the near future," Findley said.