| MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION | MAPEA | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
THE MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION The Michigan Association of Professors of Educational Administration (MAPEA) established in March 1968 when it was decided that such an organization was vital to the advancement of educational administration in Michigan. A committee was set up to draft a constitution which was adopted on October 31, 1968. The four major purposes listed in the constitution are:
It is important to note that the creation of this organization came
about because of other developments in the state. Prior to this,
the professors of educational administration had been meeting informally,
but with the creation of the Michigan Congress of School Administrator
Associations, a more formal organization was required for full participation
in that group. In addition to full participation in the Michigan Congress of School Administrator Associations and all of its major committees, MAPEA has carried an active program of its own through its spring and fall meetings and its various task forces. Some of the task forces include:
MAPEA also
participates in the Educational Forum and its committees which is an
association of professional and lay education associations including
the Michigan Congress, Michigan Education Association, Michigan Federation
of Teachers, Parent-Teacher Association, Michigan Association of School Boards,
and the Michigan Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. This concludes
the role of MAPEA in the formal educational structure in Michigan. What
follows is an opinion by one of the original officers and a former
president of the Michigan Association of School Administrator Associations
on the impact of the MAPEA. First, the three members who sit on the Michigan Congress Council play a unique role. Since they prepare administrators for all administrative roles, they are often looked to by superintendents, principals and other administration groups for unbiased recommendations. Second, MAPEA members do have much more ready access to the literature in educational administration than do other groups, and they should and do provide a love of information. Finally, the organization of the Michigan Congress opened up channels for inputs by MAPEA members that previously were not available. It was very difficult for professors of educational administration to maintain an active role in all of the administrator groups in the state. By focusing on the Michigan Congress and Educational Forum, it is more easily possible to maintain contact with all organized groups in education in Michigan. |
||||||||||