General Education Study

The General Education Program at Eastern Michigan University (GE) has begun a self-study, as part of the Provost’s three-year General Education Review plan. In this phase, GE is conducting a review of the program’s goal(s). Part of this study will also involve aligning proposed goals for GE with the new University Mission Statement, but the other part is engaging stakeholders in exploring desired, proposed, or possible goals for GE. In program design, determining learning goals is an essential precursor to any questions about learning activities, such as courses and other activities aimed at student learning outcomes.

This review is partly in response to significant changes in the context in which the program is delivered as opposed to when it was designed 15 years ago. Context is a crucial component of program design, and these changes require, at the very least, an intentional engagement in understanding how program goals may need to change. Further, in light of the HLC requirements below, the GE Study will ensure alignment between GE and the university's mission, values, strategic plan, and employment opportunities.

Equally important, a comprehensive study of GE, which we have begun with its goals, will provide the EMU community with an opportunity to dialogue about major issues confronting General Education programs across the United States. Our reading list below includes a snapshot of some of those issues.

In addition, the current context has highlighted GE’s need for greater transparent alignment. Transparent alignment occurs when learning activities, courses, and program design, display to learners why they are engaged in the particular learning they are being offered. Thus, once goals are identified, the next task is to align the program with those goals, then transparently align the program. When a program is properly aligned, learners can easily make sense of why they are engaging in the courses they are offered and the learning activities they are provided in light of the goals and learning outcomes.

To this end, the study team is designing programing to collect as many ideas as possible around appropriate goals for the program in its new context.

Our primary tools for this semester are student focus groups, summaries of work already done, and a campus wide survey.

Take the survey HERE!

You may take the survey as often as you like, in case you think of something else you'd like to share!

Additional Information of Note

This semester's GE-EMU Study Team: John Koolage, Amanda Maher, Chiron Graves, Jess Elton, and Amy Johnson