Beginning in the early 1990's my research focused broadly on the impact of trauma exposure and the development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the specific areas within this broad framework have changed. Early in my career I was focused on epidemiology of trauma and PTSD (Vrana and Lauterbach, 1994) the factor structure of PTSD (King et al., 2009; Lauterbach, Vrana, King and King, 1997), instrument development (Lauterbach and Vrana, 1996), and potential risk factors for development of PTSD (Lauterbach and Vrana, 2001). This work was quite broad and included work with a variety of populations including college students (Vrana and Lauterbach, 1994), burn victims (Mason, Lauterbach, McKibben, Lawrence and Fauerbach, 2013), cross-cultural work (King et al., 2009; Lauterbach, Somer, Dell and VonDeylen, 2008) and nationally-representative samples of victims exposed to a broad array of traumas (Lauterbach, Behnke and McSweeney, 2011; Lauterbach, Vora and Rakow, 2005).
More recently, my research has narrowed to focus on child maltreatment. Admittedly, some of that initial work lacked direction and examined a range of topics including, for example, personality characteristics of child maltreatment victims (Allen and Lauterbach, 2007) and the impact of childhood trauma on the quality of parent-child relationships (Lauterbach et al., 2007). However, in 2012 I applied for and received a modest fellowship to Cornell University at the National Data Archives on Child Abuse and Neglect. Since that time my work has focused on longitudinal trajectories of symptoms among child maltreatment victims (Lauterbach, Allen, Poehacker and Phillips, 2017; Lauterbach and Armour, 2016). In addition, it has focused on risk/protective factors for symptom change (increase/decrease) among child maltreatment survivors and those at elevated risk for maltreatment. This has typically involved the use of Growth Mixture Modeling to identify distinct subgroups of maltreatment survivors defined by differences in initial levels (intercept) and symptom trajectory over time (slope).
Throughout my career I have been able to support the work of my graduate students. Some of this work focused on trauma and PTSD (cf. Reiland and Lauterbach, 2008; Reiland, Lauterbach, Harrington and Palmieri, 2014). However, other work has examined non-trauma topics including the potential role of Facebook as a mechanism for improving quality of life (McCloskey, Iwanicki, Lauterbach, Giammittorio and Maxwell, 2015), the effects of religiosity and trauma on self-esteem (Reiland and Lauterbach, 2008), cross-cultural issues (Phillips and Lauterbach, in press) and longitudinal trajectories of psychological interpersonal violence among the mothers of child maltreatment victims (Poehacker, Phillips, Riggs and Lauterbach, 2017).
One question of central interest to students applying to work in my lab is: what am I looking for in a student? I am primarily interested in students who want to focus their professional career on understanding the causes, consequences, and longitudinal effects of child maltreatment. In addition, I am particularly interested in students who have experience with, or interest in, the use of advanced statistical techniques to address the problems I mentioned earlier. Many of the data sets I work with are large and complex. For example, I have worked with the National Comorbidity Survey, the replication of the National Comorbidity Survey and most recently the Longitudinal Studies on Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN). The LONGSCAN study is a 5-site longitudinal study of the prevalence, consequences, risk, and protective factors of child maltreatment. Working with this type of data requires an eye for detail, patience, a background in child maltreatment, the ability to problem solve, and a willingness to learn contemporary data analytic techniques.
In 2014, I developed a psychology study abroad course devoted to the history of Western European psychology. Since that time I have taken two groups of approximately 16 students each overseas. The class typically meets for six weeks in the US and during that time I present on topics that will not be covered while overseas. The next two weeks are spent in Austria (Vienna and Mauthausen), Germany (Würzburg and Leipzig) and England (London and Kent). Although the specific dates change from year to year, the itinerary looks like this:
Doctoral students who have worked for me serve as the trip managers.