Assessment Committee

The College of Arts and Sciences Assessment Committee (CASAC) began working in October of 2012 toward the goal of enhancing student learning opportunities in the college’s many programs. The committee, which is faculty led, continues to encourage and assist faculty and administrators who seek to use contemporary assessment techniques to improve student learning opportunities. CASAC collaborates with the University Assessment Committee, the CAS Dean's Office and the College Advisory Council to achieve this end.

  • Call for Participation for 2023-24

    Expand dropdown

    The faculty-led College of Arts and Sciences Assessment Committee (CASAC) supports the work of assessing student learning at the program level in order to improve our programs and the educational opportunities they provide to students. Our accreditor, the Higher Learning Commission, requires us to show that we assess student learning and that we improve our programs in response to assessment data (criteria 4.B.1-3 and 5.C.2).

    Our assessment process is flexible. Choose an assessment project that will strengthen your program and benefit your students. If you already have an assessment program in place, use the CASAC process to document the work you are doing. If you are starting an assessment program, feel free to consult the resources on our CASAC website or ask a CASAC member for help.  

    Please document your work through these two steps:

    1. Complete your Assessment Plan and upload it to the CASAC portal by Nov 15, 2023.
    2. Complete your Report telling what you did and what you learned. Use one of these templates to write your report:
      1. Report Template for Programs Beginning the Assessment Process (or Beginning Again)
      2. Report Template for Programs Consistently Contributing

    Upload your report to the CASAC portal by April 30, 2024. 

    As always, we are happy to answer questions you may have or to meet with your program or department. We look forward to working with you this year.

  • Assessment Committee Members

    Expand dropdown


    John Dunn, English 

    Amanda Maher, History and Philosophy, co-chair

    Tricia McTague, Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminology 

    Laura Pawuk, Music and Dance 

    Greg Plagens, Political Science, co-chair

    Meriah Sage, Communication, Media and Theatre Arts 

    Angela Staples, Psychology 

    Robert Winning, Biology 

    Mehmet Yaya, Economics 

    Department Heads

    Natalie Dove, Psychology 

    Harriet Lindsay, Chemistry

    Associate Dean

    James Egge 

  • Best Practices: The Ongoing Program Improvement Loop

    Expand dropdown

    Student learning is a campus-wide responsibility, and while our efforts may start in the classroom, it is a multidimensional, continuous, and collective effort. Many years of assessment at EMU and other institutions have led to a variety of techniques and practices to increase opportunities to improve student learning in individual courses and programs. CASAC recommends faculty and administrators think about ongoing program improvement in a continuous loop that includes four stages: plan, do, check and act.

    Planning and Goal Setting

    This stage is an appropriate place to start for a new course, the implementation of revised outcomes, or other additional program initiatives. It invites important but sometimes under-considered questions:

    • At the course level, what do I want students to learn in my course? It can be helpful to capture in writing the learning outcomes the course is supposed to address–both course outcomes and general education outcomes, if relevant.
    • At the program level, what do we want students to learn in our program or initiative? Related questions logically follow: 
      • Which program outcomes do we want to evaluate? 
      • Do we want to assess the effectiveness of a program delivery platform? 
      • Do we want to focus on the learning outcomes of a specific type of student? 
      • How can we observe or assess the identified outcomes? 


    While assessment requires attention to outcomes, equally important are the conditions and experiences that lead to student engagement and success. 

    • In the classroom, this includes lesson planning, teaching strategies, pacing, text selection, and/or the cultivation of classroom climate. 
    • At the program level, this may include a change to prerequisites, a new instructional platform, a new mentorship program, or assessment of newly revised learning outcomes.   

    Checking and Identifying 

    After we set goals and make an assessment plan, we must check our data and compile our observations to evaluate if students are meeting the outcomes. In this phase we also identify trends and patterns and illuminate successes and areas of further improvement. This phase may include:

    • At the course level, reviewing student papers, projects, surveys, or exam results. 
    • At the program level, disaggregating assessment results,  professional exam results, review of capstone projects, student surveys, and the collegial sharing and recording of observations. 

    Informed Action

    When engaging in continual improvement, this informed action phase is sometimes referred to as ‘closing the loop.’ Here, programs take what we have learned, issues that emerged, and areas of growth and propose changes and additions to our program. Actions may include:

    • At the course level, changes in texts and materials, changes in pedagogy, revisions to assessments, and sourcing professional development. 
    • At the program level, curricular changes, instructional support, student support, resources, and revisions to the assessment plan.
  • Closing the Loop: Examples of Program Improvement in the College of Arts & Sciences

    Expand dropdown

    There is value in all stages of the assessment process as explained in the Best Practices: The Ongoing Program Improvement Loop section. The point where the process is most likely to break down is in the final stage, which is to act. Using what has been learned is critical, and it is often referred to as 'closing the loop.' Here are some common types, examples of changes that a program might make (adapted from California State University-Fullerton), and EMU resources that can provide support. 

    Types of Change 
    Places of Discussion & Possible Resources

    Change prerequisites

    Add required courses

    Replace existing courses with new ones

    Change course sequence

    Add internships, labs and other hands-on learning opportunities

    Department Meetings

    Departments' Instructional Committees

    Faculty Support

    Provide targeted professional development opportunities

    Increase number of TAs or peer mentors

    Add specialized support to faculty (Library, Academic Technology, etc.)

    Increase support to promote dialogues and community among faculty


    Change course assignments

    Add more active-learning components to course design

    Change textbooks

    Increase opportunities for formative feedback and peer-assisted learning

    Student Support-Academic

    Increase tutors

    Add more online resources

    Improve advising to make sure students take the right courses

    Provide resources and mentorship to encourage community building among students and between students and faculty

    Student Support-Personal
    Provide resources that support mental health, food insecurity, and financial assistance

    Improve or expand lab spaces

    Provide resources to support student independent research

    Assessment Plan

    Refine outcome statements

    Change methods and/or measures

    Change where (e.g. courses) the data are collected

    Collect additional data

    Improve data reporting and dissemination mechanisms

  • Submit a Plan or Report

    Expand dropdown

    Faculty and administrators engaged in the assessment process this year can follow the link on this page to submit a plan or report. All plans and reports are received and stored by the Office of Institutional Research and Information Management. Members of CASAC review the plans and provide feedback on reports.

    If you are using the submission site for the first time, ask Associate Dean Jim Egge to request access for you. After uploading a file, be sure to click "Save." To access the template forms you must be logged into your account.

    Submit a Plan or Report

    Assessment Plan Template

    Report Template for Beginning Programs

    Report Template for Programs Consistently ContributingCurriculum Map Template



Skip Section Navigation